This be the case of which all my civil actions are filed against . There is testimony of alleged victim’s wife stating I had her husband In a head lock choking him. There’s testimony of alleged victims father in-law starting I beat him in the head repeatedly with my fist. Truth is the alleged victim was the aggressive party of this case and I held him down with one hand until the alleged victim was exhausted and gave up attempts to fight. You will also read in my book the alleged victim’s statements in depositions that Gerald did nothing but subdue me, in other words meaning ( I detained him till he could not fight anymore ) In other words I defended myself. Three statements against me with no similarities at all. For information on this case to be filed by the state is insane. I prevented the attacker from harming me, apparently the state thinks I should accept bodily from the aggressor before I can defend myself. As I said in my book” If this was a gun fight in the wild west I would have to be shot first before I could shoot him “. Now these papers above are from a back ground check for employment and these papers clearly state I was convicted of a felony , the only thing true on these papers is the sentencing of this case ( court cost ) that’s it, I was convicted of a misdemeanor and notice there is no document on the nine months and five days I spent in jail. It was just ruled recently in the Supreme Court of America that upon proving your innocence that the one year statute of limitations on habeas corpus is lifted , this case is not over. The contents of this paper work is without a doubt defamation of character.
Last week, in a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court decided McQuiggin v. Perkins.* The Court held that a Schlup gateway “actual innocence” showing can overcome the one-year statute of limitations time bar. Ginsburg wrote the (nice) majority opinion and Scalia wrote the (troubling) dissent.
State laws do not change are consitutional rights. Someone in Colorado can smoke weed but some in Florida will go to jail. If you have money for a civil attorney they take the matter into closed chambers and you win your case by right of being treated as equal. If you don’t have a civil attorney to protect your rights you do some kind of time rather it be probation or jail. Now how is this not violating your rights, the courts are aware of the right of being treated as an equal so how is it possible for the state to file charges that violate this right. It’s cases like this and my own that have me trying to bring civil assistance to are court systems to protect us from this misconduct behavior with law enforcement and our court systems as I have said before they protect themselves from violating our rights but do not protect us from law enforcement violating our rights. This is why I claim prejudice to the people by the courts
I’m now looking at a case of prejudice acts, it is the people who make it possible for the government to exist and the people’s rights should be protected. Our courts number one concern should be to protect the innocent,THEY DO NOT. All they do is rob us of our lives, our freedom to benefit themselves. It is an act of prejudice not to protect the people’s rights in a civil manner within our court systems. The only time our courts bring up a civil matter is when they our protecting themselves.Are they not part of the same federal government who are supposed to protect our rights , where does it come about that our rights are separated from theirs, we all have the same rights. You look at a case in a criminal since then look at the same case in a civil sense, it’s the same case.The courts provide you with a public defender from the same people that our trying to convict you and they refuse to defend your rights. It takes a criminal act of intent to violate your civil rights, it is unjust and prejudice to the people with violation of our right of being innocent until proven guilty for the courts not to provide the people with council of a criminal and civil defense.If a act is committed by fraud or purging themselves to harm ones freedom is it not the victims right by freedom of choice to prosecute that case in criminal or civil matter. A public defender tells you, you can file all the civil cases you want but you can’t file criminal charges. Why not, if the action is there, I will tell you why, The public defenders office is a branch of the state and they would be filing charges against themselves. That’s why I believe that being represented by the state is a conflict of interest.
Matthew: 5 / 33 to 38, “let your answers be yes and no” swearing is a form of evil. The court’s use the bible to swear in testimony to trial to swear in officers for duty. All the way up to the president of the United state’s of America, the System uses the bible to swear in their pledges. This does not make you righteous or honorable you are who you are. Are there any good officers if one officer doesn’t stand-up to another officers misconduct. Justice is for the people and there is no justice in a court without civil assistance to protect us from misconduct of law enforcement
Our judicial court system protects themselves from violating our rights, but do not protect our rights from being violated by law enforcement. The court system provides the people with a lawyer from the very same people who are trying to convict them. Is there one person who can not see the conflicts of interest in this. A lawyer told me “the only one who’s going to defend me is me”. If your rights have been violated then a crime has been committed, the crimes committed against me to violate my rights are pergury and fraud. This is not how our judicial system is supposed to work. When you have a lawyer represented by the court to defend you ,you have the right to counter suit for criminal/civil actions of misconduct that have been committed against you. A court appointed lawyer will not take these actions to defend you. The law I’m fighting to pass “THE GENERAL FREEDOM ACT (THE LOSS OF)”gives the people the opporytunity to show their innocence prior to criminal information being filed by the state, do to valuable information being with held from filed reports by law enforcement. The passing of this law will protect the people from insufficient counseling by the public defender,misconduct behavior of law enforcement and false information being filed by the state. It protects the right of being innocent until proven guilty.